Allow me to first thank the VATUSA Staff for their hard work during this time. They are an extremely cohesive and hard-working staff, and definitely kept operations on the tracks. Also thanks to the ARTCC staffs, from the ATMs all the way down. Training has continued, promotions have been made, and events are taking place. I do apologize again for the unforseen delays.
Your new Director requires no introduction. His credentials and experiences, both real world and VATSIM are vast, and having held the position before, this is nothing new to him.
Please welcome Gary Millsaps back as VATUSA1. I know he'll do a fine job.
Congrats Gary!
_________________
Bryan Wollenberg
VATSIM - North America Regional Director
This is awesome. Can't wait to see how this works out. Gary, I wish you the best. Once around wasn't enough, huh? Just remember what you said in TeamSpeak a few short months ago. ;) I sure do.
Thursday, April 29, 2010
Wednesday, April 28, 2010
Blowing my own horn!
Some of you may have heard by now via FaceBook, but I had my funding through the VA approved to go to flight school! I will be attending TransPac Flight Academy in Phoenix. I'll be leaving with a Commercial CFI CFII and MEI for all of your hard earned tax payer dollars. So, let me say THANK YOU to you, for helping my dreams come true! I am definitely very excited, and looking forward to getting back to Phoenix and getting started.
Now, here's the important part: None of this would have ever been possible without VATSIM, and the people who I met in VATSIM and have helped me along the way; Todd Cox, first and foremost for helping me get into the Navy, and helping me to understand that even at 27, I could become a Controller and affect a positive change in my life. Mike Hayden for encouraging me along the way and helping me to better understand ATC. I never would have thought that joining the Navy and becoming a Controller would be the pad that I needed to launch my dreams. Jason Vodnansky for helping me get involved and shape my leadership skills through various positions at Jacksonville ARTCC.
This is why I write this blog. Others need to know that VATSIM is a great organization, run by completely incompetent and ineffective people. The system is corrupt from the highest levels and organized to be a self-serving, self-empowering organization. This was not what the original Founders had in mind.
Now, here's the important part: None of this would have ever been possible without VATSIM, and the people who I met in VATSIM and have helped me along the way; Todd Cox, first and foremost for helping me get into the Navy, and helping me to understand that even at 27, I could become a Controller and affect a positive change in my life. Mike Hayden for encouraging me along the way and helping me to better understand ATC. I never would have thought that joining the Navy and becoming a Controller would be the pad that I needed to launch my dreams. Jason Vodnansky for helping me get involved and shape my leadership skills through various positions at Jacksonville ARTCC.
This is why I write this blog. Others need to know that VATSIM is a great organization, run by completely incompetent and ineffective people. The system is corrupt from the highest levels and organized to be a self-serving, self-empowering organization. This was not what the original Founders had in mind.
Thursday, April 15, 2010
Another real gem.
Whoever sent this: Thank you!
Bo,
I have some news that you will find not so shocking, but this was known by VATSIM legal under George Marinakis. It was first discussed under Alex Bailey’s tenure. It concerns the offline actions of the former ATM at Miami.
http://www2.jcfloridan.com/jcf/news/local/article/sex_assault_case_slow_to_trial/83786/
This case was dropped due to prosecutorial error; the case was not brought to trial quick enough violating the defendants rights. Essentially evidence and interviews were lost. The comment from the former ATM was “My lawyer says I can beat this.”, not the comment expected like, “I didn’t do it!”, this was heard third hand.
It was stressed heavily to Alex B. that he contact VATSIM legal ASAP, it took a little convincing. This conversation took place a week before the Miami live event. No one who was attending the live event knew this, and there were children under 18 who would be attending. What if something happened, could VATSIM be held liable? You could understand the concern.
The note back from VATSIM legal was that they would monitor the situation, but there wasn’t anything they could do. Understandably they could not without a legal resolution. What was shocking to those in the know that no one said or asked him to step down until the issue was resolved.
Now we have this…..
http://www.heraldtribune.com/article/20100407/ARTICLE/4071040/2055/NEWS?p=1&tc=pg
Read the article, the former ATM in question is mentioned by name on page 2.
I find it fascinating that there is nothing in writing on the network, code of conduct etc. With online pedophiles in abundance and the claimed number of members VATSIM has, there have to be a few on the network and it is my understanding there was one incident previous to this one (there was no mention that anything happened online).
This was the result of a Google search, these articles were not found until Alex B told a select few what the issue was and who was involved.This is public information. His initial reaction was nonchalant at best.
The ATM in question is no longer ATM of Miami, and he may have stepped down because of this new legal action. I noticed the ATM of Miami position was posted on 3/25.
Additionally, and most troubling:
The former ATM still is a Supervisor
Bo,
I have some news that you will find not so shocking, but this was known by VATSIM legal under George Marinakis. It was first discussed under Alex Bailey’s tenure. It concerns the offline actions of the former ATM at Miami.
http://www2.jcfloridan.com/jcf/news/local/article/sex_assault_case_slow_to_trial/83786/
This case was dropped due to prosecutorial error; the case was not brought to trial quick enough violating the defendants rights. Essentially evidence and interviews were lost. The comment from the former ATM was “My lawyer says I can beat this.”, not the comment expected like, “I didn’t do it!”, this was heard third hand.
It was stressed heavily to Alex B. that he contact VATSIM legal ASAP, it took a little convincing. This conversation took place a week before the Miami live event. No one who was attending the live event knew this, and there were children under 18 who would be attending. What if something happened, could VATSIM be held liable? You could understand the concern.
The note back from VATSIM legal was that they would monitor the situation, but there wasn’t anything they could do. Understandably they could not without a legal resolution. What was shocking to those in the know that no one said or asked him to step down until the issue was resolved.
Now we have this…..
http://www.heraldtribune.com/article/20100407/ARTICLE/4071040/2055/NEWS?p=1&tc=pg
Read the article, the former ATM in question is mentioned by name on page 2.
I find it fascinating that there is nothing in writing on the network, code of conduct etc. With online pedophiles in abundance and the claimed number of members VATSIM has, there have to be a few on the network and it is my understanding there was one incident previous to this one (there was no mention that anything happened online).
This was the result of a Google search, these articles were not found until Alex B told a select few what the issue was and who was involved.This is public information. His initial reaction was nonchalant at best.
The ATM in question is no longer ATM of Miami, and he may have stepped down because of this new legal action. I noticed the ATM of Miami position was posted on 3/25.
Additionally, and most troubling:
The former ATM still is a Supervisor
Wednesday, April 14, 2010
Dave Klain's email
This was sent to somebody and was posted as a comment. I got this email, but forgot to post it because I was busy with "Real life commitments" Not really, this is real life, and I just plain forgot. My bad.
Here's the background (via a comment):
Gentlemen, let's not forget the removal of a Supervisor from his position because he filed a valid complaint against Norman. You can always count on the good ole boy club to band together and protect their own. The corruption runs deep in VATSIM, yet they continue to bark orders from their mothers' basements.
Upon receiving the complaint, Dave sent the following statement to the BoG in order to cover up the removal of the SUP and make it look like it was the board's decision. Excellent leadership Capta... I mean Commander.
Who/what is BT?
Email below:
----------------
I would appreciate any comments/suggestions for improving this email before I send it (I won’t send it until I get home tonight).
BT BT
At this point I think things have gone on long enough. Michael – has ---- responded to your hints about resigning as a supervisor? It is clearly not in the interests of the network that ---- continue on as a staff member in any capacity, let alone a network supervisor where he has access to CERT given his past actions utilizing CERT. I understand that you need to keep good relations with your supervisors, but at this point he needs to go. If it will make it easier, I will call a vote of the BOG on the matter of firing ---- as network supervisor so you can tell him the BOG made the decision. For Terry (and anyone else who may be NORDO in the next day or so), please send me your proxy votes (or post them to this list) so that we will not delay a vote result pending your votes….
Here's the background (via a comment):
Gentlemen, let's not forget the removal of a Supervisor from his position because he filed a valid complaint against Norman. You can always count on the good ole boy club to band together and protect their own. The corruption runs deep in VATSIM, yet they continue to bark orders from their mothers' basements.
Upon receiving the complaint, Dave sent the following statement to the BoG in order to cover up the removal of the SUP and make it look like it was the board's decision. Excellent leadership Capta... I mean Commander.
Who/what is BT?
Email below:
----------------
I would appreciate any comments/suggestions for improving this email before I send it (I won’t send it until I get home tonight).
BT BT
At this point I think things have gone on long enough. Michael – has ---- responded to your hints about resigning as a supervisor? It is clearly not in the interests of the network that ---- continue on as a staff member in any capacity, let alone a network supervisor where he has access to CERT given his past actions utilizing CERT. I understand that you need to keep good relations with your supervisors, but at this point he needs to go. If it will make it easier, I will call a vote of the BOG on the matter of firing ---- as network supervisor so you can tell him the BOG made the decision. For Terry (and anyone else who may be NORDO in the next day or so), please send me your proxy votes (or post them to this list) so that we will not delay a vote result pending your votes….
Tuesday, April 13, 2010
Another email
This is the email sent to me by Michael Hodge concerning the resignation. To me, this clearly identifies the problem with VATSIM. Here's my understanding of the issue, very directly. I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong. There is a small handful of people on the EC/BoG who are committed to doing a good job. There is a larger handful of completely ineffective "leaders" who have no interest in anything other than self-serving interests. Who are those people? Well, I'm not quite ready to out them, yet, (Rolland Collins) and I just don't think it would be polite to name names (Norman Blackburn). Somewhere along the line, there was no "safety valve" built into the system which allows for the removal of incompetent, inactive, or self-serving people to be removed from the BoG. There is a process, but it is, like every other process in VATSIM a pain in the ass process.
Here's another thought, and since the timing is fitting: If you applied for the VATUSA1 Director position; You're either a fool, or, are a re-run director, which makes you a BIGGER fool. If you're looking to really make a difference, and lead a group of people, you're barking up the wrong tree. If you're a self-serving, ass kissing, good ol boy, you're going to fit right in, but leave with most of those relationships broken or fractured, and frustrated all over again. This email will show you that you're going to be under-cut at every decision. If you're a re-run director, and in with the fellows up top, you're going to last a short amount of time because you're not friends with EVERYBODY on the BoG, and you're going to be stifled at every turn, as well. Those who you are friends with, are going to be left shrugging their shoulders saying, "we tried...and such" but still on the BoG and you're still trying to kiss their asses.
So, without further ado....
Bo,
I am sending this to you simply to clear my name. Despite what some may think, I wanted nothing more than to better the training process within the VATUSA division during my nine month tenure as the VATUSA Training Services Administrator. A feat which I think it is safe to say that I was able to do, at least in some regards.
-Mike
Forwarded conversation
Subject: Resignation
------------------------
From: Michael D. Hodge Jr
Date: Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 9:47 PM
To: b.wollenberg
Bryan,
I would like to let you formally know that as of the time of this e-mail, I have resigned as VATUSA Training Services Administrator. I have no problem orienting the new guy when he is selected if need be.
Thanks,
Michael D. Hodge Jr
----------
From: Bryan Wollenberg
Date: Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 12:33 AM
To: vatusa3
Michael,
Allow me thank you for your service and for the amazing work you did as USA3!! I can assure you that you have been the hardest-working guy in the position in a very long time, you worked with your guys from the ARTCCs, and the results of that work are obvious. I have gotten nothing but praise from all sorts of people (including ZLA, who can be a tough crowd to please), and not a single complaint.
So thanks a bunch Mike! I really do appreciate your efforts.
Bryan
----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael D. Hodge Jr"
To: b.wollenberg
Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 6:47 PM
Subject: Resignation
----------
From: Michael D. Hodge Jr
Date: Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 12:42 AM
To: Bryan Wollenberg
Bryan,
Thanks for kind words Bryan, for they do mean a lot. However, I'm afraid that you simply don't get it. I want you to think of the reasons why we stepped down, and then look at any possible ways of fixing it. If you need any help with that, i'm here to be of assistance.
-Mike
----------
From: Bryan Wollenberg
Date: Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 12:51 AM
To:
Hi Mike,
I definitely do get it. Unfortunately, some of the things going on are well beyond my paygrade, and there is nothing I can do to fix them. I know why you and Andrew stepped down, and I can't say I disagree with the reasoning at all. It is what it is. I find myself regularly frustrated by some of the things that go on. But just as you guys are told things by me, I am told by the BOG how things are to be done. There isn't much to be done about that.
To: "Bryan Wollenberg"
Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 9:42 PM
Subject: Re: Resignation
----------
From: Michael D. Hodge Jr
Date: Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 1:05 AM
To: Bryan Wollenberg
Bryan,
All I ask, and i'll leave you with this, is two things. First, please remember that perception is everything. It's all about how your perceived by the people above and below you. One should not only try to ensure their perception is positive above their pay grade, but also below. Do you think Andrew knew that his head was on the chopping block when he sent that letter to you about refusing certain aspects of the GRP? Yes of course he knew, but he also knew that by him doing so, he was sticking up for the rights and beliefs of those below him. That single move did a lot more to improve his relations with the ATM's of the division then anything else he did. Not because he put is foot down to the BOG/EC, but because they perceived him as sticking up for what they felt collectively was right (regardless of how "right" that really was).
Secondly, we are all given our positions because someone above us felt like we could do it, and do it well. I always had the philosophy of, "allow me the room and space to do my job, and let me make my mistakes". Alex, Andrew, Rob, and any other "supervisor" over me knew that and respected that. In return I gave them 1000% of my life to doing the job to the extent it needed to be done. If there was ever a point in which I felt like they weren't allowing me the space I needed (within reason) then the choice is simple: bow out gracefully. I'm not saying that is what happened tonight, but more and more it appears as though the EC/BOG are on a "power grab" and that this higher than though mentality exists. It appears more and more as though people aren't being able to do their jobs the way they feel they should be done and instead are micromanaged. Although it isn't affecting me yet, I don't even want to allow it the opportunity. As stated in the first point, it's all about perception. So you, as we all must, ask ourselves, "How am 'I' perceived?"
-Mike
Here's another thought, and since the timing is fitting: If you applied for the VATUSA1 Director position; You're either a fool, or, are a re-run director, which makes you a BIGGER fool. If you're looking to really make a difference, and lead a group of people, you're barking up the wrong tree. If you're a self-serving, ass kissing, good ol boy, you're going to fit right in, but leave with most of those relationships broken or fractured, and frustrated all over again. This email will show you that you're going to be under-cut at every decision. If you're a re-run director, and in with the fellows up top, you're going to last a short amount of time because you're not friends with EVERYBODY on the BoG, and you're going to be stifled at every turn, as well. Those who you are friends with, are going to be left shrugging their shoulders saying, "we tried...and such" but still on the BoG and you're still trying to kiss their asses.
So, without further ado....
Bo,
I am sending this to you simply to clear my name. Despite what some may think, I wanted nothing more than to better the training process within the VATUSA division during my nine month tenure as the VATUSA Training Services Administrator. A feat which I think it is safe to say that I was able to do, at least in some regards.
-Mike
Forwarded conversation
Subject: Resignation
------------------------
From: Michael D. Hodge Jr
Date: Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 9:47 PM
To: b.wollenberg
Bryan,
I would like to let you formally know that as of the time of this e-mail, I have resigned as VATUSA Training Services Administrator. I have no problem orienting the new guy when he is selected if need be.
Thanks,
Michael D. Hodge Jr
----------
From: Bryan Wollenberg
Date: Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 12:33 AM
To: vatusa3
Michael,
Allow me thank you for your service and for the amazing work you did as USA3!! I can assure you that you have been the hardest-working guy in the position in a very long time, you worked with your guys from the ARTCCs, and the results of that work are obvious. I have gotten nothing but praise from all sorts of people (including ZLA, who can be a tough crowd to please), and not a single complaint.
So thanks a bunch Mike! I really do appreciate your efforts.
Bryan
----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael D. Hodge Jr"
To: b.wollenberg
Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 6:47 PM
Subject: Resignation
----------
From: Michael D. Hodge Jr
Date: Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 12:42 AM
To: Bryan Wollenberg
Bryan,
Thanks for kind words Bryan, for they do mean a lot. However, I'm afraid that you simply don't get it. I want you to think of the reasons why we stepped down, and then look at any possible ways of fixing it. If you need any help with that, i'm here to be of assistance.
-Mike
----------
From: Bryan Wollenberg
Date: Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 12:51 AM
To:
Hi Mike,
I definitely do get it. Unfortunately, some of the things going on are well beyond my paygrade, and there is nothing I can do to fix them. I know why you and Andrew stepped down, and I can't say I disagree with the reasoning at all. It is what it is. I find myself regularly frustrated by some of the things that go on. But just as you guys are told things by me, I am told by the BOG how things are to be done. There isn't much to be done about that.
To: "Bryan Wollenberg"
Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 9:42 PM
Subject: Re: Resignation
----------
From: Michael D. Hodge Jr
Date: Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 1:05 AM
To: Bryan Wollenberg
Bryan,
All I ask, and i'll leave you with this, is two things. First, please remember that perception is everything. It's all about how your perceived by the people above and below you. One should not only try to ensure their perception is positive above their pay grade, but also below. Do you think Andrew knew that his head was on the chopping block when he sent that letter to you about refusing certain aspects of the GRP? Yes of course he knew, but he also knew that by him doing so, he was sticking up for the rights and beliefs of those below him. That single move did a lot more to improve his relations with the ATM's of the division then anything else he did. Not because he put is foot down to the BOG/EC, but because they perceived him as sticking up for what they felt collectively was right (regardless of how "right" that really was).
Secondly, we are all given our positions because someone above us felt like we could do it, and do it well. I always had the philosophy of, "allow me the room and space to do my job, and let me make my mistakes". Alex, Andrew, Rob, and any other "supervisor" over me knew that and respected that. In return I gave them 1000% of my life to doing the job to the extent it needed to be done. If there was ever a point in which I felt like they weren't allowing me the space I needed (within reason) then the choice is simple: bow out gracefully. I'm not saying that is what happened tonight, but more and more it appears as though the EC/BOG are on a "power grab" and that this higher than though mentality exists. It appears more and more as though people aren't being able to do their jobs the way they feel they should be done and instead are micromanaged. Although it isn't affecting me yet, I don't even want to allow it the opportunity. As stated in the first point, it's all about perception. So you, as we all must, ask ourselves, "How am 'I' perceived?"
-Mike
Sunday, March 28, 2010
Interesting email thread
Received this thread between Dan Everette and Brian Wollenberg. Just for a little compare and contrast, Dan is a guy who has accomplished some great things while in service, and in leadership positions, to our country. Brian is a young man who has just recently become employed as an Air Traffic Controller at Los Angeles Center.
Any guesses on who might have a better grasp on the concept of "leadership"?
Mr. Wollenberg,
http://forums.vatsim.net/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=42948&start=60
Unfortunately I forgot to turn off notifications of new posts when I posted
my final post on that cesspool of a thread. Rather than reply there and
publically show how much more of an idiot you've made yourself look, I'll do
it privately. Read, don't read, couldn't care less. At least I get to part
with a clear conscience.
Let's get the obvious out of the way. I don't know you, don't care to, and
couldn't care less about you or what happens to you. My passion resides (or
rather resided) in the VATSIM network, and its progressive trip down the
sewer pipes over the years.
======================================
All I can say Dan is that it definitely sounds like it's time for a break.
Take some time off, come back with a new perspective, and hopefully things
will be more to your liking. I've been close to that point a couple times
myself. Nothing a nice vacation doesn't fix. I wish I could get you to
understand why the changes being made are positive changes, but I somehow
don't think that's going to happen. Ah well, I tried.
======================================
You are absolutely right, and I am taking a break. A permanent break. The
only thing that would ever entice me to consider coming back would be proof
of the elimination of the good ole boys network, utter corruption within the
network at all levels and clear demonstrations of leadership. The changes
you call "positive" are only positive in your mind, and don't even BEGIN to
address the root cause. I could write page upon page of what's wrong with
this network and its leadership as well as how to fix it, but I would just
be reiterating items already staring you in the face, which you see fit to
ignore.
These next two quotes of yours I'm lumping together, because they address
the same thing and royally piss me off. Not to mention they clearly show how
much of an idiot you are and have no business being in that position:
======================================
Trust me, this is done as well. The training programs are constantly being
looked at, both at the Divisional and Regional levels. No hiding behind a
policy here. So, to see if I understand you correctly...let's say that ZXX
in VATUSA is found by the VATUSA staff to be too restrictive. They don't
allow controllers to work at any of the smaller airports without going
through a rigorous training program, let's say. VATUSA tells ZXX that they
need to lessen the restrictions at the smaller, lower-traffic, less-complex
airports. Well...isn't that the same thing the major/minor airports
accomplish, automatically, and without the need for all this "policing" of
the individual facilities? Sounds awfully similar to me.
AND
Hate to break it to you, but if I were to go tell a facility that it is
being too restrictive, and they need to do xxx to fix it, that's a policy.
It may not be a formal written policy, but it's policy nonetheless. Wouldn't
it be nice to actually have some standards in writing so that we don't HAVE
to keep dealing with this over and over again?
======================================
First, you do not know me, never have known me, and don't know my background
and experiences. Let me just sum it up with this statement: Don't ever
fucking patronize me with this bullshit explanation of "policy" whether
written or verbal.
EVERYTHING in the above two quotes, CLEARLY illustrates that you do not know
the difference between being a leader and being a bureaucrat. Working with a
facility and its staff to fix problems (such as overly restrictive training)
and having an open dialog back and forth, not dictating (except as a very
last resort) how a facility is run, and getting EVERYONE on the SAME TEAM,
because they WANT to be there, and WANT to contribute to the collective
good, is called leadership. Telling a facility how they are to wipe their
ass, and what ply paper to use, only after EC approval and a 30 page
document, is called bureaucracy. If you honestly don't understand the
difference, and significant short/long term effects of using one over the
other, you're more useless in that job than your predecessor, and that's
saying quite a lot. The above quotes, especially the second one (which is my
favorite to be honest), can be translated to: "I'm too much of a pussy to
actually deal with people and talk to them. Rather, I'll just point to a
complex set of policies and say 'you have to do it, it's written here'.
Phew, I no longer have to make a decision and be held accountable for it.
Also, I don't really have to communicate with the person, other than point
them to a link and cite a paragraph in the policy".
======================================
I'm glad you brought this up actually. I can count on slightly over one hand
the number of people who have gotten a hold of me to offer assistance, or
even discuss the current state of the network or any problems. Most of those
were from VATCAN and VATCAR. My inbox is certainly always open (I know you
have heard that one before) but I actually do answer every email I receive.
Haven't gotten one from you to offer assistance, discuss policies, nothing.
Maybe it was lost?
======================================
Nope, nothing was lost. As a matter of fact, it's spot on. The same fucking
bullshit response by everyone in the organization. You've only been in that
job for a short period, and I've had no reason to contact you, because I
wanted to see how you would take the job and change things. Obviously you're
on course and speed to run the network further into the cesspool it has
become. I can count more than 2 dozen e-mails and pm's I've sent to various
"leadership" members over the years trying to engage in dialog with no
response (not your problem though, because they weren't TO you, right?).
Question. when you become a VAT, do they give you a press-packet
on standard responses to all topics? Because your reply above is almost
cut&paste from the rest of the assclown responses by members in "leadership"
positions on this network. It's always a "nothing wrong in my shop. oh,
there is?? I never received an e-mail from you, and my inbox is always
open". Want to know my concerns with this network???? Go read the past 3+
years of posts on the VATUSA and VATSIM forum as a whole. Maybe if you learn
how to read and comprehend, you'll discover several trends and give yourself
a little history lesson there.
It's sad that I've gotten so fed up with the "leadership" of this network
that my coming on 7 years and well over 10k hours devoted to it seems an
utter waste. Especially when I look back at the fond memories over the
years, and what I've taken away. There used to be a time where I would
schedule real life around what's going on in VATSIM. I would look forward to
coming home on a Friday night, plugging in and controlling/flying where
there was loads of traffic and ATC. If it wasn't for VATSIM, I never would
have pursued my FAA ratings and started teaching people to fly. I've met a
lot of great people who I would go out of the way for to help. Even if some
of them were to call me at 2am, looking to get bailed out of some southeast
Asian jail, I'd be wiring money to them. Don't worry, you're not one of
them.. They know who they are.
However, when I was taking a significant break from the crap, then came back
(honestly thinking I would volunteer again to be a full-time instructor) and
saw the utter bullshit about the GRP2 (especially after the HUNDREDS of
hours I put into aligning ZBW's program with GRP1), I said this wasn't for
me anymore. After reading Paul's post, then seeing the replies to his and
mine, the decision was made then that I'm gone. I'm not going to be part of
an organization where some group of no-talent assclowns who couldn't control
their way out of a fucking wet paper bag are going to sit there and have to
pass judgment on whether KBOS is a major airport or not. This network has
hemorrhaged so many quality pilots/controllers because of the utter bullshit
that goes on, that's it's not even laughable.
You TRULY care about this network (which seems quite unlikely at this
point)? DECREASE the levels of bureaucracy, INCREASE the levels of TRUST
amongst the members, and RETURN this organization to the precepts on which
it was founded (a love for aviation and learning). Not all facilities are
equal, not all training programs are equal. Each facility has its own
personality, and you will NEVER be able to normalize them across the board.
Provide general (and when I mean general, you want a GRP? Half page or less)
guidance, and deal with people on a one-on-one basis. Some will take it to
either extreme, and you deal with those. Not by pointing to a piece of
paper/policy, but by working with them. Making decisions that you're willing
to stand by and can justify (to your superiors, and since this is a
volunteer organization, to the public as well). Not everyone is going to get
along, and people are going to have to work together. Until you (and
everyone else in a position of "leadership" around here) wrap your head
about that concept, you're useless and impotent as so-called "leaders" on
this network.
This is my only e-mail on the subject, and there is nothing to discuss. If
you don't get it by now, you never will. Don't like what I said, think my
language was bad? I'm a sailor. sue me.. Send me to DCRM, I could care less.
My membership in this organization means absolutely nothing to me anymore.
At least I'm able to part from the organization (though not on good terms),
at least with a crystal clear conscience on venting how I feel that you, the
EC, and BoG are running this network into the ground.
I was contemplating lying (by omission), but I'll just tell you the truth.
Don't expect a reply from me. My inbox is always open, even to you! (open to
everyone as a matter of fact) It's just your name and e-mail address have
been added to my spam blacklist. If it gets past the spam filter, I'll still
ignore it.. See, that wasn't so difficult! You should try the truth
sometime, people will begin to trust you.
Good day, sir.
Any guesses on who might have a better grasp on the concept of "leadership"?
Mr. Wollenberg,
http://forums.vatsim.net/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=42948&start=60
Unfortunately I forgot to turn off notifications of new posts when I posted
my final post on that cesspool of a thread. Rather than reply there and
publically show how much more of an idiot you've made yourself look, I'll do
it privately. Read, don't read, couldn't care less. At least I get to part
with a clear conscience.
Let's get the obvious out of the way. I don't know you, don't care to, and
couldn't care less about you or what happens to you. My passion resides (or
rather resided) in the VATSIM network, and its progressive trip down the
sewer pipes over the years.
======================================
All I can say Dan is that it definitely sounds like it's time for a break.
Take some time off, come back with a new perspective, and hopefully things
will be more to your liking. I've been close to that point a couple times
myself. Nothing a nice vacation doesn't fix. I wish I could get you to
understand why the changes being made are positive changes, but I somehow
don't think that's going to happen. Ah well, I tried.
======================================
You are absolutely right, and I am taking a break. A permanent break. The
only thing that would ever entice me to consider coming back would be proof
of the elimination of the good ole boys network, utter corruption within the
network at all levels and clear demonstrations of leadership. The changes
you call "positive" are only positive in your mind, and don't even BEGIN to
address the root cause. I could write page upon page of what's wrong with
this network and its leadership as well as how to fix it, but I would just
be reiterating items already staring you in the face, which you see fit to
ignore.
These next two quotes of yours I'm lumping together, because they address
the same thing and royally piss me off. Not to mention they clearly show how
much of an idiot you are and have no business being in that position:
======================================
Trust me, this is done as well. The training programs are constantly being
looked at, both at the Divisional and Regional levels. No hiding behind a
policy here. So, to see if I understand you correctly...let's say that ZXX
in VATUSA is found by the VATUSA staff to be too restrictive. They don't
allow controllers to work at any of the smaller airports without going
through a rigorous training program, let's say. VATUSA tells ZXX that they
need to lessen the restrictions at the smaller, lower-traffic, less-complex
airports. Well...isn't that the same thing the major/minor airports
accomplish, automatically, and without the need for all this "policing" of
the individual facilities? Sounds awfully similar to me.
AND
Hate to break it to you, but if I were to go tell a facility that it is
being too restrictive, and they need to do xxx to fix it, that's a policy.
It may not be a formal written policy, but it's policy nonetheless. Wouldn't
it be nice to actually have some standards in writing so that we don't HAVE
to keep dealing with this over and over again?
======================================
First, you do not know me, never have known me, and don't know my background
and experiences. Let me just sum it up with this statement: Don't ever
fucking patronize me with this bullshit explanation of "policy" whether
written or verbal.
EVERYTHING in the above two quotes, CLEARLY illustrates that you do not know
the difference between being a leader and being a bureaucrat. Working with a
facility and its staff to fix problems (such as overly restrictive training)
and having an open dialog back and forth, not dictating (except as a very
last resort) how a facility is run, and getting EVERYONE on the SAME TEAM,
because they WANT to be there, and WANT to contribute to the collective
good, is called leadership. Telling a facility how they are to wipe their
ass, and what ply paper to use, only after EC approval and a 30 page
document, is called bureaucracy. If you honestly don't understand the
difference, and significant short/long term effects of using one over the
other, you're more useless in that job than your predecessor, and that's
saying quite a lot. The above quotes, especially the second one (which is my
favorite to be honest), can be translated to: "I'm too much of a pussy to
actually deal with people and talk to them. Rather, I'll just point to a
complex set of policies and say 'you have to do it, it's written here'.
Phew, I no longer have to make a decision and be held accountable for it.
Also, I don't really have to communicate with the person, other than point
them to a link and cite a paragraph in the policy".
======================================
I'm glad you brought this up actually. I can count on slightly over one hand
the number of people who have gotten a hold of me to offer assistance, or
even discuss the current state of the network or any problems. Most of those
were from VATCAN and VATCAR. My inbox is certainly always open (I know you
have heard that one before) but I actually do answer every email I receive.
Haven't gotten one from you to offer assistance, discuss policies, nothing.
Maybe it was lost?
======================================
Nope, nothing was lost. As a matter of fact, it's spot on. The same fucking
bullshit response by everyone in the organization. You've only been in that
job for a short period, and I've had no reason to contact you, because I
wanted to see how you would take the job and change things. Obviously you're
on course and speed to run the network further into the cesspool it has
become. I can count more than 2 dozen e-mails and pm's I've sent to various
"leadership" members over the years trying to engage in dialog with no
response (not your problem though, because they weren't TO you, right?).
Question. when you become a VAT
on standard responses to all topics? Because your reply above is almost
cut&paste from the rest of the assclown responses by members in "leadership"
positions on this network. It's always a "nothing wrong in my shop. oh,
there is?? I never received an e-mail from you, and my inbox is always
open". Want to know my concerns with this network???? Go read the past 3+
years of posts on the VATUSA and VATSIM forum as a whole. Maybe if you learn
how to read and comprehend, you'll discover several trends and give yourself
a little history lesson there.
It's sad that I've gotten so fed up with the "leadership" of this network
that my coming on 7 years and well over 10k hours devoted to it seems an
utter waste. Especially when I look back at the fond memories over the
years, and what I've taken away. There used to be a time where I would
schedule real life around what's going on in VATSIM. I would look forward to
coming home on a Friday night, plugging in and controlling/flying where
there was loads of traffic and ATC. If it wasn't for VATSIM, I never would
have pursued my FAA ratings and started teaching people to fly. I've met a
lot of great people who I would go out of the way for to help. Even if some
of them were to call me at 2am, looking to get bailed out of some southeast
Asian jail, I'd be wiring money to them. Don't worry, you're not one of
them.. They know who they are.
However, when I was taking a significant break from the crap, then came back
(honestly thinking I would volunteer again to be a full-time instructor) and
saw the utter bullshit about the GRP2 (especially after the HUNDREDS of
hours I put into aligning ZBW's program with GRP1), I said this wasn't for
me anymore. After reading Paul's post, then seeing the replies to his and
mine, the decision was made then that I'm gone. I'm not going to be part of
an organization where some group of no-talent assclowns who couldn't control
their way out of a fucking wet paper bag are going to sit there and have to
pass judgment on whether KBOS is a major airport or not. This network has
hemorrhaged so many quality pilots/controllers because of the utter bullshit
that goes on, that's it's not even laughable.
You TRULY care about this network (which seems quite unlikely at this
point)? DECREASE the levels of bureaucracy, INCREASE the levels of TRUST
amongst the members, and RETURN this organization to the precepts on which
it was founded (a love for aviation and learning). Not all facilities are
equal, not all training programs are equal. Each facility has its own
personality, and you will NEVER be able to normalize them across the board.
Provide general (and when I mean general, you want a GRP? Half page or less)
guidance, and deal with people on a one-on-one basis. Some will take it to
either extreme, and you deal with those. Not by pointing to a piece of
paper/policy, but by working with them. Making decisions that you're willing
to stand by and can justify (to your superiors, and since this is a
volunteer organization, to the public as well). Not everyone is going to get
along, and people are going to have to work together. Until you (and
everyone else in a position of "leadership" around here) wrap your head
about that concept, you're useless and impotent as so-called "leaders" on
this network.
This is my only e-mail on the subject, and there is nothing to discuss. If
you don't get it by now, you never will. Don't like what I said, think my
language was bad? I'm a sailor. sue me.. Send me to DCRM, I could care less.
My membership in this organization means absolutely nothing to me anymore.
At least I'm able to part from the organization (though not on good terms),
at least with a crystal clear conscience on venting how I feel that you, the
EC, and BoG are running this network into the ground.
I was contemplating lying (by omission), but I'll just tell you the truth.
Don't expect a reply from me. My inbox is always open, even to you! (open to
everyone as a matter of fact) It's just your name and e-mail address have
been added to my spam blacklist. If it gets past the spam filter, I'll still
ignore it.. See, that wasn't so difficult! You should try the truth
sometime, people will begin to trust you.
Good day, sir.
Monday, October 19, 2009
This thing called GRP2
Let me put up a starting point for reference, so that we’re all on the same page:
http://forums.vatsim.net/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=42948
So back on the 4th of September Kyprianos Biris posted that GRP2 was a done deal, to be in effect September 1. Cocked, locked, and ready to rock. A few days later, that course is reversed by David Klain, stating “GRP2 needed to be reviewed by the VATSIM Board of Governors”. Not so fast, my friend! Kyp retracts and states that, “it will HOPEFULLY be completed shortly”, and the need a “few days to complete”. It is now October 20, 2009.
Still. Nothing. Not a single word. Now, let’s look at a quote from David Klain. “Bo, I appreciate that you think I and the rest of the VATSIM leadership are completely incompetent. Your posts have made that clear time after time after time. I also respect your right to have that opinion. Can we just stipulate that "Bo Gercke thinks Dave Klain and every other senior leader in VATSIM is incompetent" and move on?”
So, does the shoe fit, yet? Or do we need, again, more time to figure this whole ambivalent/incompetent thing out? Remember way back in “The List” topic, my number 1 issue was the level of ambivalence demonstrated by the entire staff of VATSIM? Status quo for VATSIM is to deflect any criticism, discredit the criticizer, and accuse that individual of “not being a team player”, or, “not having all o the facts”, or some other ridiculous un-founded accusation. And, it was followed to a “T” by Dave Klain. And now, yes, Dave, I DO think you are ambivalent. If you can’t get 11 people on the same page, going the same direction, then yes, you are incompetent, too.
Dave countered with the idea that “as much time as necessary needed to be taken to get it right”. Only to be followed with this masterpiece,
“Personally, I'm pretty impressed that the BoG (spread out over Europe, North America Oceania and Asia) was able to not only complete the review, but also have a discussion and come to consensus on the feedback to send back to the BoG in two weeks. Neither the U.S. Congress nor any parliamentary body I know of can ever act that fast...especially about an important document like this.”
Dave, in all of your self-important gusto, the BoG consists of 11 people. Congress consists of 535 people. I can see the challenges in getting 535 people, in two separate houses, on the same page. Challenges in getting 11 people on the same page? High school football teams do it week in and week out, and that’s playing both sides. This also plays directly into point number 2 in “The List”: Lack of teamwork and communication.
A beautiful timeline was laid out discrediting the absurd allegation that it had taken 7 months to go through this process, when in fact, it has taken longer. I stated that the process started in March, when in fact, the wheels were put into motion in early November. If I still remember how to count correctly, that makes it 11 months, not 7. But, then again, I’m said to be “confusing apples and oranges.”
Since you’ve asked why there is so much “angst” about this situation; Certainly you’re not so naïve to think that the membership of VATSIM is fed up with the antics of VATSIM, the BoG and other Staff members over a GRP document. Time and again, the BoG, and others, goes out of its way to put out blatant lies and disinformation.
Then, when time, plain old simple time, and a little fact finding reveals something completely different, attempts are made to cover it with smoke and mirrors, windows dressings, shenanigans and semantics. People then attempt to discredit individuals, deflect the issue, and distract them by telling them they “don’t have all of the facts.” You cannot condescend to people, call them liars, when in fact they are not, but instead your agenda is to attempt to save your ass, and expect good people to stick around.
People have left because you have fired people from director positions and promoted them to having even more responsibility, and more power, when they were fired for abusing the power that they initially held. This harkens the “Good ol’ Boy Club” allegations, which were deflected, denied, and followed with accusations. The VATSIM conventions were the place to be met and seen. It’s where the pool of people were found who were put into leadership positions. Not all of them, but most of them. When those stopped, so too did the pipeline in which to find new talent, and leaders. It’s not a bad thing, it’s makes perfect sense to meet people face to face. But, those were discontinued because it was “too difficult”.
So here we are October 20, and we still have nothing. Just resign already if you’re not going to perform the job that you committed to doing.
http://forums.vatsim.net/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=42948
So back on the 4th of September Kyprianos Biris posted that GRP2 was a done deal, to be in effect September 1. Cocked, locked, and ready to rock. A few days later, that course is reversed by David Klain, stating “GRP2 needed to be reviewed by the VATSIM Board of Governors”. Not so fast, my friend! Kyp retracts and states that, “it will HOPEFULLY be completed shortly”, and the need a “few days to complete”. It is now October 20, 2009.
Still. Nothing. Not a single word. Now, let’s look at a quote from David Klain. “Bo, I appreciate that you think I and the rest of the VATSIM leadership are completely incompetent. Your posts have made that clear time after time after time. I also respect your right to have that opinion. Can we just stipulate that "Bo Gercke thinks Dave Klain and every other senior leader in VATSIM is incompetent" and move on?”
So, does the shoe fit, yet? Or do we need, again, more time to figure this whole ambivalent/incompetent thing out? Remember way back in “The List” topic, my number 1 issue was the level of ambivalence demonstrated by the entire staff of VATSIM? Status quo for VATSIM is to deflect any criticism, discredit the criticizer, and accuse that individual of “not being a team player”, or, “not having all o the facts”, or some other ridiculous un-founded accusation. And, it was followed to a “T” by Dave Klain. And now, yes, Dave, I DO think you are ambivalent. If you can’t get 11 people on the same page, going the same direction, then yes, you are incompetent, too.
Dave countered with the idea that “as much time as necessary needed to be taken to get it right”. Only to be followed with this masterpiece,
“Personally, I'm pretty impressed that the BoG (spread out over Europe, North America Oceania and Asia) was able to not only complete the review, but also have a discussion and come to consensus on the feedback to send back to the BoG in two weeks. Neither the U.S. Congress nor any parliamentary body I know of can ever act that fast...especially about an important document like this.”
Dave, in all of your self-important gusto, the BoG consists of 11 people. Congress consists of 535 people. I can see the challenges in getting 535 people, in two separate houses, on the same page. Challenges in getting 11 people on the same page? High school football teams do it week in and week out, and that’s playing both sides. This also plays directly into point number 2 in “The List”: Lack of teamwork and communication.
A beautiful timeline was laid out discrediting the absurd allegation that it had taken 7 months to go through this process, when in fact, it has taken longer. I stated that the process started in March, when in fact, the wheels were put into motion in early November. If I still remember how to count correctly, that makes it 11 months, not 7. But, then again, I’m said to be “confusing apples and oranges.”
Since you’ve asked why there is so much “angst” about this situation; Certainly you’re not so naïve to think that the membership of VATSIM is fed up with the antics of VATSIM, the BoG and other Staff members over a GRP document. Time and again, the BoG, and others, goes out of its way to put out blatant lies and disinformation.
Then, when time, plain old simple time, and a little fact finding reveals something completely different, attempts are made to cover it with smoke and mirrors, windows dressings, shenanigans and semantics. People then attempt to discredit individuals, deflect the issue, and distract them by telling them they “don’t have all of the facts.” You cannot condescend to people, call them liars, when in fact they are not, but instead your agenda is to attempt to save your ass, and expect good people to stick around.
People have left because you have fired people from director positions and promoted them to having even more responsibility, and more power, when they were fired for abusing the power that they initially held. This harkens the “Good ol’ Boy Club” allegations, which were deflected, denied, and followed with accusations. The VATSIM conventions were the place to be met and seen. It’s where the pool of people were found who were put into leadership positions. Not all of them, but most of them. When those stopped, so too did the pipeline in which to find new talent, and leaders. It’s not a bad thing, it’s makes perfect sense to meet people face to face. But, those were discontinued because it was “too difficult”.
So here we are October 20, and we still have nothing. Just resign already if you’re not going to perform the job that you committed to doing.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)